Church. Immediate mental images, aren’t there? Over the past two years I’ve really looked at what that word means. Is it a building that we go to for worship? Is it the people who attend and worship in that building? Is it that act of going to a worship service? (I’m going to church on Sunday) Are people who don’t go to the "church" building a part of the church? Where does it begin and where does it end? These are just a few of the questions that have inundated my mind for some time now.
Here’s what has become the most important image to me. (Disclaimer: I’m saying that as ME, not YOU. This is stated so that we look at where we are and where we are going. It’s not law, it is opinion.) I see the church in a much wider scope than I ever did before. A global, more organic form, if you will. You see, in the past I had always viewed the idea of "church" as whatever particular group I was a part of. Church was the local congregation that I participated in activities with. It was the denomination that we were part of. Essentially my point of view was very narrow. Now if you had asked me at any time about the "church" on the whole and other denominations or groups I would have given you a very accepting answer. I would never detract from another denomination, but inside and even behind closed doors (usually in staff meetings and such) I would make statements that basically said that we knew what God wanted and I hoped everyone else would figure it out before it was too late. I’m really not even sure exactly what I was thinking most of the time. I don’t think that I ever thought that any other "church" was not a church, but I didn’t take their differences from what WE believed as being valid, either. I guess in a way it was like "I know they believe in God, but they sure are going to have alot of stuff that they will have to answer to later!". I’m not totally sure about the whole thing but I do know that my thinking was extremely linear and even left me extremely concerned about friends and family that didn’t believe the same way that I did. The interesting thing was that my concerns were not over whether they believed in God or not. My concerns were that they weren’t baptized the right way or believed that you could lose your salvation or that they saw the bible as a collections of teachings and not the exact, accurate words of God almighty. I was not as accepting as I MYSELF believed I was.
When we started this journey forward I was faced with some realities that called me to either accept or condemn. The understanding came that I could not waffle on issues and say that one person is totally wrong on something that was not a deal breaker (like baptism) and then support someone else just because of relationship or not wanting to upset them. If I truly believed what the bible said then I was going to have to move above the levels of separation and look at things from a much wider view. In other words, Jesus did not live by denominational or cultural confines. He lived above the fray. He was not concerned about which church you went to. He was only concerned with who you believed in. Of course, it would be easy to challenge these statements since He was the beginning of the religion that we know today. He didn’t have the same objectives, you could argue. I wonder, though, if our objectives are supposed to be different. Is the separation that has been cultivated over the past 1000 years really what He had in mind? Of course not. Jesus was starting a movement of unity, not division. Division came later and, for the most part, at our own hands.
As I write here quite often I am writing as a person trying to get above the fray. I want to see "The Church", not just church. I personally hope to see a movement of people who don’t want simply an activity to attend on Sundays or a more social group to be a part of. These things should, I believe, be byproducts of something greater. Am I concerned about the state of churches on the whole when I attend meetings with church leaders that are telling me to "get in with the influential people in your town so that your church can grow quicker"? Yes, I am. That’s not a slam at the church on the whole. It is a statement, though, that I believe would be relevant to Christ. Am I concerned about the direction of the church on the whole when we are spending so much time on recruitment and draw and not on the individual and their life? Yes, I have to admit that I am. Now, I’m not talking about any particular church. I’m talking about every church and that includes NETChurch. None of us corner the market on "right" in God’s eyes, I’m sure. I believe, though, that if we can all move our concentration away from the entertainment value of drawing numbers and convert that into really specific individual ministry then we will have a much better and healthier track than the one that most of us are on.
Here’s what I mean: In the multiple churches that I have been a part of (& the numbers are numerous) there was always this drive to "top" last year. If we had a Christmas performance then we needed to do bigger and better to keep momentum going. When we did VBS we first asked the question "How many did we have last year" and then set out to do better this year. The same thing happened with our weekly worship services. If there were 250 this week then we wanted to see the same or larger next week. If it got stagnant then the conversations became "How do we change this so that more people will come?". Though we were basically thoughtful of the individuals that made up that number we were most concerned about making sure the number stayed close to the same or better. In other words, as long as the numbers are consistent HOW we got there doesn’t matter as much. I know that sounds harsh and like I’m being critical. If I am then I’m being critical towards myself. I have created and perpetuated this idea as much or more than anyone.
I’m trying to figure out how to become a part of "The Church" as this huge body of believers that stretches beyond the points of the imagination and leave behind the idea of "church" as a place that we go to have a service, do our time, and then leave. In a perfect world the church will be a living, breathing entity that encompasses all who believe in Jesus Christ. It will take on new and exciting ways of expressing itself and will be concerned about the individual that God created more than the crowd that is nameless. The beauty will be greater than we have ever imagined.
Does this mean that I’m burned out on church, hating the very existence that has been the backbone of my life? No. It means that I’m excited. Excited that some of us really want to see worship and not performance. And those people already exist in every ministry on the face of this earth. Is "The Church" dead? Far from it. I think that to an extent the church is looking at the family’s history and, in a very grown up way, saying "Maybe they knew what they were talking about back then". There is no perfect church. Flaws are there in all of our ministries. What will eventually separate "The Church" from CHURCH will be simply focus. Who are we focused on? If we are focused on Christ then what are we doing that looks like Him and points towards Him and not towards ourselves?
This discussion has gone on for years and years. It hasn’t ended and never will. I hope that I will be one of those that sees change as a necessary and beautiful thing, not a detraction from today or yesterday. Hopefully I will be able to distinguish and help "The Church" become what God needs it to be.
All I can do is continue to try.
Recent Comments